It was this lea: of unemployment which -ace women workers, who survived on hand -spinning began attacking the new machines. It simply meant that as a result of this machine, many weavers would be left without any job and became unemployed. By the use of this machine, a single worker could make a number of spindles, and spin several threads at n time. This machine speeded up the spinning process and reduced labor demands. The Spinning Jenny was invented by James Hargreaves in 1764. The East India Company appointed Gomasthas to supervise weavers in India.The port of Surat declined by the end of the eighteenth century.In the seventeenth century, merchants from towns in Europe began employing peasants and artisans within the villages.Women workers in Britain attacked the Spinning Jenny.Question: On a map of Asia, find and draw the sea and land links of the textile trade from India to Central Asia, West Asia and Southeast Asia. Therefore many workers were opposed to the use of spinning Jenny. But due to Spinning Jenny Productivity increased, as many spindles could be yearned at one time from one wheel.At that time all members of a family were employed, and earned. Whereas earlier one wheel could yarn only one spindle.Spinning Jenny was the machine that made it possible to yarn many spindles from one wheel.Explain why many workers were opposed to the use of the Spinning Jenny. Machines produce standard and uniform goods, while customers ask for variety, range color, specifically designed handmade goods.I would prefer to pay low wages to cheap labor rather than buy a costly new machine.It is costly ineffective, not easy to repair and it breaks down frequently.Explain in your letter what you have heard and why you do not wish to invest in the new technologyĪnswer: Due to under-written reasons that I have gathered on my own experiences, I don’t want to invest in the new technology: Question: Imagine that you are a merchant writing back to a salesman who has been trying to persuade you to buy a new machine. Therefore the difference between the two figures is that of what they symbolize beauty (figure 4) and pollution (figure 5). In figure 5 the Manchester is shown to have a cluster of industries that emit lot of smoke.In figure 4 the Lancashire cotton mill, adds to the beauty of the city due to its lighting system during the evening.Can you see any difference in the way the two images show industrialization? Explain your view briefly Note down one event or aspect of your own life which adults such as your parents or teachers may think is unimportant, but which you believe to be important. Note down one event or aspect of your own life which adults such as your parents or teachers may think is unimportant, but which you believe to be important.Īnswer: The way in which historians focus on industrialization rather than on small workshops is a good example of how what we believe today about the past is influenced by what historians choose to notice and what they ignore. Question: The way in which historians focus on industrialization rather than on small workshops is a good example of how what we believe today about the past is influenced by what historians choose to notice and what they ignore. Due to this many people die, and many get injured for their whole lives.įor example: Hiroshima and Nagasaki in Japan. Development in Nuclear Weapons: Modern nuclear weapons are the most destructive because of the radioactive pollution that they spread.Development in Agriculture:Hybrid seeds, urea and chemical manure have led to the problem of soil sterility, more consumption of water and environmental problems.You may like to think of areas related to environmental issues, nuclear weapons or disease. Question: Give two examples where modern development that is associated with progress has led to problems.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |